Re: State of Tennessee v. David M. Keen -- Julias Jaded Jester
| Posted by Gene Harrogate ® , Aug 10,2001,10:23 | MetroBlab |
A lesser known Robert Coe...
must have the free acrobat reader to view this document
Are you suggesting that if he were better known, he wouldn't have to have the free reader?
~Gene Harrogate
State of Tennessee v. David M. Keen
Re: State of Tennessee v. David M. Keen -- Gene Harrogate
| Posted by Julias Jaded Jester ® , Aug 10,2001,10:30 | MetroBlab |
No, I'm suggesting that if you want to see the document, then YOU had better have the free acrobat viewer, cause it's a PDF file.
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: State of Tennessee v. David M. Keen -- Julias Jaded Jester
| Posted by Gene Harrogate ® , Aug 10,2001,11:09 | MetroBlab |
God, you're such a tool.
~Gene Harrogate
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Gene Harrogate
| Posted by jessefox , Aug 10,2001,11:34 | MetroBlab |
Let's see now, JJJ -- in the last few days you've given us links to convicted sex offenders and now some kind of sicko killer (no, I'm not going to look him up, thanks, I'm just basing that assumption on your comparison to Robert Coe). Why is it that the guy obsessed with "protecting" "victims" is the one who spends so much time researching individual criminals? You don't see any of the rest of us looking up the details of horrible crimes in our spare time. You don't happen to have a set of those serial killer trading cards, do you?
jfm
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- jessefox
| Posted by Gene Harrogate ® , Aug 10,2001,12:52 | MetroBlab |
You don't see any of the rest of us looking up the details of horrible crimes in our spare time.
Just be glad he hasn't found Rotten.com yet.
~Gene Harrogate
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Gene Harrogate
Rotten.com is nowhere near as offensive as ManBeef.
And unfortunately, it isn't a joke at all. It's all real.
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Rev. Jack
I take it back - turns out it is a joke, played by some bored 16 year old. I do believe this makes it even more disturbing.
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Rev. Jack
| Posted by Belle ® , Aug 10,2001,15:13 | MetroBlab |
Yes. I knew it. You are way too involved.
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Belle
You are way too involved.
Sorry, I'm not sure I get your meaning.
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Rev. Jack
| Posted by Gene Harrogate ® , Aug 10,2001,15:36 | MetroBlab |
Rev.,
Here's a little piece of obscure truth for you, the word gullible is not really a word at all and appears in no dictionaries.
~Gene Harrogate
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Gene Harrogate
Well Gene, I just looked in the dictionary, and you're absolutely right. I never knew that before!
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Gene Harrogate
Sorry...I am laughing my ass off now.
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Angie
| Posted by Gene Harrogate ® , Aug 10,2001,15:49 | MetroBlab |
Sorry...I am laughing my ass off now.
By all means, stop it! A girl with no ass is, well, assless. You'll regret it if you keep it up.
~Gene Harrogate
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Gene Harrogate
I just checked...I still have ass left...WHEW! Thank God! There is no use for Assless people in this world...
JJJ v. A Sentient Being
Re: JJJ v. A Sentient Being -- Rev. Jack
| Posted by Belle ® , Aug 10,2001,15:11 | MetroBlab |
Jackie, I hope this isn't part of your ministry.