| Posted by gypsyfrocksbedlam ® , Oct 06,2003,00:35 | MetroBlab |
It seems to me that first you have to figure out what you mean by joy. "Joy" is a pretty broad word that covers a lot of feelings and experiences, each of which has its own particular characteristics. In posing the first question, I guess I'm thinking of the kind of joy that arises from one kind of novelty or another: the discovery of something new, the electricity of infatuation, the first time you walk into some room or building or park or forest and know for sure that you're someplace that feels good and right. (The specific energy of specific places, what produces and sustains it, is a topic for another day -- but one that economic development types ought to be much more concerned with than they are.) Of course, you never lose the memory of that first blush, the way it felt then, and so you can always draw on it to remind yourself. In a good relationship (whether it's with a person, place or thing), that initial dazzlement is strong enough that it periodically resurfaces unbidden and catches you by surprise and you fall in love all over again.
Still, that's only one kind of joy -- the exciting kind, I guess, the kind that words like "thrill" were invented for. There are other kinds of joy too, ones that come less from novelty than from reaching some greater awareness and appreciation of some moment or some part of your life. If it becomes arguably harder to find the shock of the new as you go along in life (although some of us never stop trying), it maybe becomes easier to reach a deeper kind of happiness. One thing that strikes me this way is the changing of seasons and years. Once you've seen and felt enough of them, you can understand them better and appreciate them more closely as they're happening. Of course, you also become increasingly aware that you have a limited number of them to observe, but to me that makes each one mean more, and you can see the variations in them, contrast the feeling of this October with the one before it, and the one before that. Sometimes I try to remember where I was and what I was doing on this particular day one year ago, two years ago, eight years ago, 20 years ago. It brings alive the present for me and also reminds me that there is a continuum to all of this, all of my experiences, and that continuum, the whole sum total, is me. It's how I am where I am, and whatever comes next will always be shaped by what happened before -- but at the same time, I have choices and freedom to decide exactly how. That can be terrifying, I suppose, but it also seems like a kind of joy to me.
Then there's art, which moment for moment -- in music, literature, paintings, movies -- has given me a good chunk of the joys in my life. It doesn't have to be joyful art, it can be dark and brutal and angry (though, again, it doesn't have to be that either), it just has to make me feel alive. And maybe that's really what joy is all about anyway, huh? Feeling alive? He not busy being born is busy dying, etc. Joy is feeling alive and despair is feeling dead. And I suppose you can't really recognize one unless you're also familiar with the other. I'm not sure that "joy" can exist indepent of "not-joy." But I also don't buy the doomed-romantic notion that suffering is somehow more honest than joy. I think real joy can be the most honest thing in the world. I've known a lot of bitter people in my life, and I love and value many of them. I think they have a lot of insight. But I get off the train when they start insinuating that anything other than despair is delusional. That darkness is its own kind of delusion. I mean, yeah, we're all going to die, true. But we had to be born first, right? Anyway, these are the kinds of things autumn makes me think about.
| Posted by Kevin Knack Jr. ® , Oct 07,2003,00:29 | MetroBlab |
You may trust I am making every effort to avoid the dreaded �doomed-romantic� stigma, but I nevertheless feel motivated to offer some feedback here. I would ask in response, how does one �feel dead,� if death is the absence of conscious existence? I have encountered a number of people who feel like they want to die or that death couldn�t be worse than continuing on in a life of misery, but there�s a fine difference in wording there. I would counter that there are many miserable people who do indeed feel �alive� and perceive their existence with a clear consciousness but who, at the same time, deem that life not to be worth living due to any number of intolerably negative factors, often beyond their control, such as debilitating chronic illness, absolute poverty, or social isolation. This life offers no guarantee of joy, because our entire conscious existence is based upon the aversion of suffering, which serves the biological function of promoting our survival. Those who are able to retrospect their lives and observe a greater proportion of happiness than sorrow are the fortunate ones. Life is a very bold choice for any informed mind to make, for some much more than for others.
| Posted by gypsyfrocksbedlam ® , Oct 07,2003,02:44 | MetroBlab |
Well of course, actually being dead probably feels a lot different than anything we encounter while alive. Or it feels like nothing at all, whatever. But as a metaphor, feeling dead in my experience is the loss (even momentary) of a sense of living in the world, of an awareness of anything beyond your own immediate misery. I agree that this is more easily transcended in some instances than others, either for physical or psycho/bio/logical reasons. If you are being tortured, say, or starving to death, it's hard to spend a lot of time appreciating the wonders of the universe. Likewise, if your brain chemistry and/or life experiences are such that bleakness is a default position, the mere awareness that there is joy and wonder in the world isn't gonna do much to make you actually feel it -- in fact, it can make things worse.
(Also, I'm not sure I completely go along with your "if" up above -- death might well be the absence of conscious existence, but just describing something by what it isn't doesn't really get you close to what it is -- that is to say, the absence of conscious existence doesn't negate the possibility of the presence of something else.)
This life offers no guarantee of joy, because our entire conscious existence is based upon the aversion of suffering, which serves the biological function of promoting our survival.
Not all of life is based on aversion of suffering. People actually have a pretty remarkable capacity to endure suffering if they think it will serve some end. Athletes, for example, put themselves through a huge amount of suffering. I mean, how many athletes vs. non-athletes have to have knee surgeries, tendon and ligament repair, rotator cuff operations, etc. etc. before they turn 30? Most religious orders are based on some degree of voluntary suffering. Sure, we avoid unnecessary suffering when possible, but I think most people accept that there's going to be a certain amount of it and that short-term suffering can even be healthy. Also, I think life does offer a guarantee of at least the potential for joy, even in pretty dire circumstances. Everyone I know who's spent any time in places that we think of as unspeakably impoverished and destitute has found plenty of joyful people -- not that they wouldn't be more comfortable with a house and a car and a job, but there are plenty of things to make happiness from, and comfort is just the most obvious one (and certainly not the most reliable, as any number of literary or cinematic indictments of the hollowness of middle-class life will eagerly demonstrate).
Those who are able to retrospect their lives and observe a greater proportion of happiness than sorrow are the fortunate ones.
I don't know. On balance, I'd say I know more happy people than not. And even the miserable ones have their days. I don't think happiness is nearly as elusive or rare as it's made out to be. Nobody's happy all the time, and no happiness is ever safe from misery or tragedy or just waking up in a blue funk. It's just that happiness often strikes us as trivial or fleeting, while misery tends to seem monolithic. Even if you were happy 90 percent of the time, that other 10 percent would never be far from your mind. In my limited experimentation with writing songs, for examples, I've found it much easier to tap into anger or sadness as fuel for music than joy or contentment -- Handel notwithstanding, joy and contentment aren't necessarily good muses. The reasons for this are complex and somewhat mysterious and maybe should be taken up elsewhere.
Life is a very bold choice for any informed mind to make, for some much more than for others.
Is it really boldness? Sometimes I think it's more a matter of humility, being willing to accept both your own insignificance and inpermanence. If you don't mind not mattering in any particularly meaningful way -- if you can even kind of embrace not mattering -- then it seems to me that a lot of the intangible things that produce the most misery also stop mattering so much.
On the other hand, I agree that's easier said than done.
| Posted by Kevin Knack Jr. ® , Oct 07,2003,17:11 | MetroBlab |
As you know, I operate from a strict rationalist perspective, so I presume by default that the existence of our conscious selves ends with brain death because that is the conclusion that empirical science supports. I respect the opinions of other agnostics like yourself who favor the less conclusive end of the agnostic spectrum because I know that our common ground is still sufficient to preclude any significant debate on such points as this.
Not all of life is based on aversion of suffering. People actually have a pretty remarkable capacity to endure suffering if they think it will serve some end.
Examples such as you name are particularly pronounced in humans because of our unparalleled psychological complexity. Often, we choose to endure physical discomfort in order to comfort a psychological pain that we perceive to be greater in magnitude, as illustrated by the example of religious fundamentalists who mutilate themselves in order to receive affirmation from their community that the sacrifice will exempt them from eternal torment in the afterlife. (Natural selection is far from a perfect architect.) Such freakish examples are certainly the exception rather than the rule, of course. In standard practice, humans evade things that are either physically or psychologically unpleasant, often unaware that in doing so, they are following an instinctive template that promotes survival and propagation.
Everyone I know who's spent any time in places that we think of as unspeakably impoverished and destitute has found plenty of joyful people.
In spite of these optimistic perspectives that have been shared with you, the fact remains that the majority of the world�s population is below the absolute poverty line and generally faces starvation, disease, and early death on a daily basis. I�m sure that American visitors to these subsustainable societies might chance to see a significant number of smiling faces during their travels, but the context must be considered. How many of those smiling faces are likely to remain that way for any significant length of time compared to the lives of luxury and stability that we enjoy? In Africa, for instance, the explosive spread of AIDS has turned many a community of �joyful people� into desolate wastelands of human misery that most Americans have only the faintest glimpse and understanding of via brief images broadcast on the evening news.
On balance, I'd say I know more happy people than not.
This sounds to me like optimism at the expense of global context. Most of these people are Americans, right? (Most not even below the lofty �American poverty line� either, I would further venture to say.)
Is it really boldness? Sometimes I think it's more a matter of humility, being willing to accept both your own insignificance and inpermanence.
I do not equate boldness with arrogance, which would be the opposite of humility. I equate boldness with courage and will, which are traits that are actually quite compatible with humility. It requires much boldness to face life when you have an informed understanding of insignificance and impermanence, as you mentioned.
If you don't mind not mattering in any particularly meaningful way -- if you can even kind of embrace not mattering -- then it seems to me that a lot of the intangible things that produce the most misery also stop mattering so much.
I can concur with this as worded. Many (but I would certainly not say all) psychological stimuli are only painful if perceived with a negative attitude. It is quite a different matter with physical stimuli, though.
--modified at Tue, Oct 07, 2003, 17:15:18
| Posted by scott ® , Oct 06,2003,01:32 | MetroBlab |
But as I get older my joy, or happiness changes a great deal it's not so ephemeral, or manic. Like peppers in a stew, as I get older, my joy becomes mellower, however my satisfaction more complex. My passion remains underneath keeping things simmering along.
A lot of my pursuits are well suited to old age, cooking, painting, Chess, Music, and I feel a lot of my goals will not be realized until I am older.
As for living and dieing, as far as I'm concerned it's just a body. It has very little to do with me.
The living always dieing, O the corpses I've left behind. Walt Whitman
--modified at Mon, Oct 06, 2003, 01:33:32
| Posted by gypsyfrocksbedlam ® , Oct 06,2003,01:37 | MetroBlab |
An excellent metaphor. It took me years of cooking to learn how to simmer things without burning them.
| Posted by Dr. Autonomo ® , Oct 06,2003,17:03 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by DnB ® , Oct 07,2003,08:17 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by DnB ® , Oct 06,2003,08:59 | MetroBlab |
Snow still makes me joyful. I love getting up early on a wintery morning and seeing snow outside the window. (As you know, we don�t get an enormous amount of snow around here.) But it sure is fun when we do. There�s just something wonderful about seeing the bare trees decorated in a white blanket of shimmering snow.
I don�t believe that suffering is more honest than joy, either. I don�t want to think that my life isn�t meaningful unless I am unhappy. I have felt great unhappiness, sorrow and despair. Those feelings didn�t make me feel more alive, though. They did make me feel hurt and pain. I prefer the joy.
--modified at Tue, Oct 07, 2003, 08:11:24