| Posted by Lysander Spooner ® , Sep 23,2003,15:23 | MetroBlab |
They are free to do what they want to to for their own happiness providing they don't infringe on the natural rights of others. Frankly, I don't give a damn if two women want to lick each other in their own home. Their private space is their private space. Now, it may become an issue if two women were to lay out on my front yard and lick each other. I may tell them to get off my property or might even invite them in for a Margarita. Bottom line is that you can't have privacy rights without property rights. They are linked just as economic and personal liberty are linked.
"Those like Senator Biden who do not understand the nexus between property and privacy rights may unwittingly be creating the groundwork for the Court to diminish protection for privacy. The most enduring protection for both rights is to view each as indispensable to the other."
2) Pro drug. Having a population full of drug addicts leads to a worse massive welfare state. Do some damn thinking.
It is the republicrats who want to provide welfare for drug addicts and everyone else. Libertarians say people should make their own decisions and not force people to support anyone else's choices be it taxpayer funded drug rehabilitation or abortions. Again, respecting people's rights.
3) open borders... oh we've seen how well that works.
Article 1, Section 8 does provide that Congress can "establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States".
Well, I guess Congress is too busy dealing with a thousand other programs to be concerned. This country has always been a land of immigrants. The freedom to immigrate is a freedom of opportunity, not a guarantee of a handout. It ought to be asked why politicans are so eager to give out handouts in the first place.