| Posted by fluffy ® , Sep 23,2003,11:50 | MetroBlab |
By SGt. Leanne Duffy
September 23, 2003
I am a National Guardsman of the 105th Personnel Services Detachment out of Lincoln, Neb. My unit and I are stationed in Kuwait at Camp Wolf. We were deployed Feb. 2. We arrived in Jordan in April and half of us were moved a week later to Kuwait to throw mail.
When our unit came back together in June we had an order to go home but it was revoked and we ended up replacing an active Army unit. When replacing the active unit we were told our date to go home was Dec. 1.
We now hear that we will be here for a full year. We are under 3rd Personnel Command. They say that when they decide who stays and who goes, it's not by how long soldiers have been deployed, just by unit necessity.
My unit processes incoming soldiers and helps soldiers redeploy for theater. We are doing a great job and are working hard to treat each soldier with care and consideration as they come past our desks. They have spread our 44 soldiers out to replace an active unit that had over 50 and to replace a National Guard unit that had over 60 soldiers. Not only are we running 24-hour operations seven days a week for these two units, but we have four of our soldiers on the redeployment side working validation for another unit! We are spread so thin and are working so hard that these knocks on our morale are devastating.
Yes, we are physically able to finish our mission, but mentally and spiritually we are dying.
If retention for the Army National Guard is of any importance, current members need to have faith in our government and our leaders. Right now, where we are, we can't see anyone taking a stand for the soldiers (as it isn't just us being treated this way but many, many soldiers).
This isn't a simple board game of Axis and Allies, this is a game people are playing with real people - people with families, not robots. You have college students out here (like me) missing over a year of college to sit and get yanked around without explanation. It has been told to the officers I have spoken to that 3rd PERSCOM refers to moving soldiers as "drug deals." You do this for me and I'll make sure your soldiers go home, etc.
Yes, without a doubt my duty is to serve my country despite her faults. I have learned I will not be able to get education and training services while I am here and I am accepting that. I am here to serve out of obligation and duty. What I'm wondering is if there are any checks and balances for those who are making decisions here?
Everyone keeps saying it is up in the air, including the personnel responsible for deciding who is going where. It feels as if every decision is off the cuff. In this situation there should be plans in place and decisions made before the rubber hits the road.
We are slowly becoming frantic. I hear people saying they are going to begin hurting themselves or others if they can't go home. The helplessness our soldiers are feeling is indescribable, it is past the point of "suck it up and drive on." We just want somewhere to drive on to.
Thank you for allowing me to bend your ear.
Sgt. Leanne Duffy is from Superior, Neb. E-mail: [email protected].
http://www.madison.com/captimes/opinion/column/guest/57361.php
| Posted by hard69rock ® , Sep 24,2003,01:39 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by fluffy ® , Sep 24,2003,07:14 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by hard69rock ® , Sep 24,2003,21:59 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by fluffy ® , Sep 25,2003,07:20 | MetroBlab |
so you are saying that there is only one officer is unhappy?!? thanks for helping me prove how delusional you are. all im doing is providing a counterbalance to people like you and your prez that keep covering your ears while proclaiming "everythings fine! no problems!"
"When I was in Gulf War 1, after the battle was over we asked when we were going home"
yep, and bush declared it over months ago too. but yet still we have a lot of troops over there, and a prez requesting an extra $87 billion for a war that he already claimed was done. so its understandable that a lot want to come home from a war that is supposed to be over. W is using the military as a police force, something they shouldnt be doing. of course, if we hadnt of sent them over in the first place we wouldnt be having this discussion at all. these brave soldiers would be home with their families, where they belong.
"But no one was complaining, it was just a question."
as lilamy commented before, you have a habit of painting your statements with a very broad brush. claiming that NO ONE complained is rather megalomaniacal of you, since you think you speak for every person that served in the 1st Gulf War. as ive already pointed out, my post was the letter of one seargant. and yet you say "no one" and "we" a lot. interesting. so, in being the official spokesperson for the entire miilitary, what do you make of the many articles in Time and Newsweek in which quite a few troops grumbled about going home and being against this war. an army of one indeed, since you seem to speak for all of them.
| Posted by lilamy ® , Sep 24,2003,07:14 | MetroBlab |
Be well,
lilamy
| Posted by hard69rock ® , Sep 24,2003,22:09 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by lilamy ® , Sep 25,2003,00:38 | MetroBlab |
Be well,
lilamy
| Posted by hard69rock ® , Sep 25,2003,23:18 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by Michael ® , Sep 26,2003,16:07 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by fluffy ® , Sep 24,2003,07:18 | MetroBlab |
i do seem to remember a comment that an (unnamed of course) officer made in Time or Newsweek about Rummy's visit in iraq a while ago. lets just say he didnt exactly have nice words about rumsfeld.
| Posted by lilamy ® , Sep 24,2003,08:21 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by Lysander Spooner ® , Sep 23,2003,15:31 | MetroBlab |