| Posted by run n gun ® , Sep 19,2003,08:37 | MetroBlab |
Retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark campaigns in Hollywood, Fla. (Marc Serota -- Reuters)
HOLLYWOOD, Fla., Sept. 18 -- Retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark said today that he "probably" would have voted for the congressional resolution last fall authorizing war, as he charged out into the presidential campaign field with vague plans to fix the economy and the situation in Iraq.
Clark said his views on the war resemble those of Democratic Sens. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.) and John F. Kerry (Mass.), both of whom voted for the war but now question President Bush's stewardship of the Iraqi occupation. "That having been said, I was against the war as it emerged because there was no reason to start it when we did. We could have waited," Clark said during a 75-minute session with four reporters.
En route to his first campaign stop as a candidate, a high-energy rally at a local restaurant, Clark said he has few specific policy ideas to offer voters right now and offered a few thoughts that might surprise Democrats flocking to his campaign. As recently as Sunday night, he was unsure if he should run for president, so Clark said voters need to give him time to think things through.
Clark's statement on the war resolution put him at odds with former Vermont governor Howard Dean, whose stock has soared among Democratic activists in recent months on the strength of his antiwar position. It could make it difficult for Clark to differentiate himself from the other nine candidates in the field on policy, other than by touting his résumé as a former Army general and commander of NATO forces in Kosovo.
In the interview, Clark did not offer any new ideas or solutions for Iraq that other candidates have not already proposed...
| Posted by Greta F. Rich ® , Sep 23,2003,13:25 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by JOHN ALRICH, ESQ. ® , Sep 20,2003,16:30 | MetroBlab |
If he aspires to higher office, he should GET HIS MESSAGE RIGHT!
He blathers inconsistencies about Iraq and Afghanistan that make DESERT ONE look decisive.
| Posted by scott ® , Sep 20,2003,22:00 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by run n gun ® , Sep 20,2003,23:30 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by scott ® , Sep 21,2003,00:16 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by JOHN ALRICH, ESQ. ® , Sep 21,2003,08:41 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by fluffy ® , Sep 19,2003,11:10 | MetroBlab |
here is a line from the article that i noticed you omitted;
"While new to politics, Clark jumped up on a chair and sounded like a seasoned pro as he delivered a lively, if brief, call to arms."
the rest of the article that RnG conveniently left out, is here;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32450-2003Sep18.html
| Posted by run n gun ® , Sep 19,2003,14:32 | MetroBlab |
Would you like me to continue to spoon feed you your pablum, too?
I hope people do read the rest of the article. That way they'd realize, as i'm sure you're starting to, that Clark is only popular while he doesn't say anything.
| Posted by ilyich ® , Sep 19,2003,15:18 | MetroBlab |
The owner of the board asked you (and everyone else) to add links to articles you post. I can't figure out why you would continue to ignore him, other tnan the fact that you are a rude asshole. Remind me to swipe some beers from your sixpack next time I see you at a party.
| Posted by hi top ® , Sep 19,2003,14:44 | MetroBlab |
| Posted by Hank IV ® , Sep 19,2003,13:11 | MetroBlab |
Don't forget to ask if they want fries with that.