Putting W. Bush into perspective.


Posted by the county clark ® , Sep 14,2003,00:01   MetroBlab

And I thought it would never happen!
W. Bush is a fantastic leader on certain issues like the protection of the American people and the war against terror (let's remember that 9/11 never would have happened if Bill Clinton had done his job and reacted appropriately after the Khobar Towers...or the U.S.S. Cole... or the first World Trade Center bombings...or when Bin Laden was offered to him at least three times on a silver platter by the Sudanese president; all irrefutable facts, if you're not a liberal, that is), but he's a decidedly bad president when it comes to spending programs.
Unfortunately, he's given the leftist democrats EVERY spending program they've asked for instead of using common sense and reducing the size of federal government.
Oh well, at least he knows the definition of the word "is."


Followups



Putting W. Bush into perspective.

Re:
Putting W. Bush into perspective. -- the county clark
Posted by fluffy ® , Sep 15,2003,09:44   MetroBlab

how many different names are you going to come up with?!?

Putting W. Bush into perspective.

Re:
Putting W. Bush into perspective. -- the county clark
Posted by Smootz ® , Sep 14,2003,16:12   MetroBlab

County Clark says: "...at least [Bush] knows the definition of the word "is.""

But Bush is a little shaky on the meaning of "have." As in, "they have WMD's."

Smootz


Putting W. Bush into perspective.

Re:
Putting W. Bush into perspective. -- the county clark
Posted by Jester_Fermaggio ® , Sep 14,2003,00:57   MetroBlab

PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF SHRUBYA'S BUTTHOLE, PUT DOWN YOUR G.W. DOLL AND KINDLY CATCH A CLUE.

Your boy's done. He's headed back to Crawford. You'll accept it soon enough. No need to justify Bush or compare him to someone far superior in intellect and leadership.

It's okay, really. Just imagine a world, after November 2004, where declaring wars on "evil" and "bad people" is absolute nonsense. Imagine a world where we take $87 billion and use it for OUR OWN NATION. Can you fathom such a place?

Imagine a President who says, "Gert and I", or "Judith and I" versus "Laura and me".

Imagine a world where intelligence is valued over "He says what he means, and he means what he says". It doesn't really matter what Bush says, if it doesn't say ANYTHING at all.

The economy stinks.
Unemployment is way too high.
We haven't capture Bin Laden.
We haven't captured Hussein.
There aren't any WMD's.
Bush lied about an Al Qaeda connection..
Wolfowitz lied about an Al Qaeda connection.
Rumsfeld and Ashcroft are maniacal monsters that need to be removed.

There WILL be a regime change in this country in 2004!




well I gotta disagree with some of that for sure.

Re:
Putting W. Bush into perspective. -- Jester_Fermaggio
Posted by Julias Jaded Jester ® , Sep 14,2003,13:12   MetroBlab

I'd say that for those folks who lean left, those who didn't like Bush from the start?

He certainly has not won you over.

I'm no huge Bush fan at this point. I did think he was a better choice than Gore, and I did vote for him OVER Gore. Me and a bunch of other Tennesseans did that, and TENNEFREAKINSEE is what cost Gore the election, not the state of Florida. But I won't go into the ten MILLION reasons why he really DID win Florida.

I also disagree that he's automatically headed back to Crawford. I think this president will actually be fairly tough to beat. I don't think you realise that removing a sitting president is harder than you might imagine. I think we will see yet ANOTHER very close race. I might be convinced to vote for John Edwards. I called his office Friday to learn his positions on several issues that are key with me, and key to others in the victims rights movement.

But I can't see myself voting for Dean at this point. A bunch of those other guys would have to come back to the center for me to vote for any of them. That (pandering to the minority) speech at the Baltimore college from Liberdork was just sickening. This guy's like Mister McGoo, and he DOES NOT HAVE A PRAYER at beating Bush. If you guys nominate Lieberman, or Gephardt, or Sharpton, or Braun, then just FORGET about it. You got Bush for 4 more years; put it in three inch letters cuz I guarantee it. Dean MIGHT be able to beat him. John Edwards WILL beat him, if he gets the chance-- NONE of those other clowns can beat him.

The economy SUCKS. It STINKS, as you said. IT SUCKS. Tons of folks might be able to say "I freakin' can't AFFORD to be a republican anymore." The economy is an issue that the democrats need to POUND home over and over. Run ON it, run WITH it, talk ABOUT IT; keep it on the burner, cuz George is WEAK on it. Unemployment IS way to high, as you said. Not getting OBL or Hussein was no big thing, and probably expected, but not finding those chemical weapons is a major DISASTER for us in worldwide perception; it now looks like we invaded a weak country and we WANT that oil. That's what France and a bunch of the euros now really think.

I don't think Bush purposely lied about Al Queda, but I sure am sick of hearing about WAR. I'm ready for war to plucking END, Jack. I want troops home, and this damn war to be OVER. Let's get back to makin' money.

Rumsfield and Ashcroft are not monsters as you've said. Ashcroft is a fine Attorney General, with an impeccable record in politics. His resume looks like a million bucks, and he's THE most qualified Attorney General in American history. He makes Robert Kennedy look like somebody's lush uncle who took some law classes at night at Toogaloo Tech. Janet Reno couldn't carry John Ashcroft's JOCK on a gym floor. He's ten THOUSAND times more qualified than she ever was.

I'm open to voting for a democrat, but not for just ANY democrat. You guys wanna WIN? Run John Edwards right down the middle on Bush, and have him choose an unknown, goodlooking, YOUNG female congresswoman as his running mate. Then there'll be a regime change.

But he's gonna be harder to beat than you think, Fermaggio, and the religious right folks in this country LIKE this guy, and they WILL show up at the polls to vote for him. A lot of older folks like Bush, and they VOTE. You guys on the left had better get some college kids voting again, as well. You've lost the House in 1994; Jefford's defection was nullified in the 2002 elections and the Senate belongs to the right; you've lost the presidency in 2000; the Supreme Court is one up for the Right; and the majority of governorships are in republican hands. Baby, you may not know this, but you ain't in charge anymore. And there's a BUNCH of folks on the left that just can't seem to realise it.

You are NOT...in charge...anymore.

This is NOT a good time in short term American political history to be a liberal. You can rally and insult conservatives all you want to, but unless you can beat them at the polls then you might just as well get USED TO SEEING THEM. Second place DOES NOT MATTER in American politics; it only matters if you can WIN.

If you guys don't come back to the center more?

You're gonna LOSE this next election.

And all that pandering to minorities is costing you votes. Every time Sharpton opens his mouth that sucking sound you hear are thousands of votes in dozens of states going right out the window. Al Sharpton is RUINING it for democrats; the man's a vicious racist and everyone knows it.




--modified at Sun, Sep 14, 2003, 13:30:02


and just a little here too

Re:
well I gotta disagree with some of that for sure. -- Julias Jaded Jester
Posted by Smootz ® , Sep 14,2003,16:16   MetroBlab

Yo, JJJ, you said, "Janet Reno couldn't carry John Ashcroft's JOCK on a gym floor." Heh he. Using a lockeroom reference while insulting a true champion of VICTIMs and VICTIM RIGHTS, really shows your respect for the femmes.

Don't go changing,
Smootz


oh Janet Reno was some slaw, dude

Re:
and just a little here too -- Smootz
Posted by Julias Jaded Jester ® , Sep 14,2003,17:53   MetroBlab

Janet Reno has never been much of a victims rights advocate-- she copped out on capital prosecutions in Miami when she was down there,a nd she copped out on prosecuting carjacking murders, a federal dp offense, when she was AG under Clinton.

The Waco, Elian, and Ruby Ridge debacles were all hers. Using the freakin' Delta Force on that Waco compound was just diabolical.

Ashcroft was a staunch supporter of victims rights, and was a solid governor where prosecutions are concerned.

Loccer room reference? Well Smootz-- when you get to the big leagues you get to run with the big dogs; femmes want equality? FINE. That works for me. Change your OWN oil, mamma. And you can open your own doors as well now, since you're burning bras and smokin' Virginia Slims as well. Welcome to the 21st century, woman. You can bring home the bacon, and fry it up in a pan.

And guess what? That lid doesn't need to stay down. It'll sit straight up and out of the way, and when a man owns the castle he ain't worried about whether the seat is up or down....


'prish

Re:
oh Janet Reno was some slaw, dude -- Julias Jaded Jester
Posted by Smootz ® , Sep 14,2003,18:05   MetroBlab

Thanks, that was worth every penny.

Smootz


Putting W. Bush into perspective.

Re:
Putting W. Bush into perspective. -- the county clark
Posted by fly on the wall ® , Sep 14,2003,00:33   MetroBlab

New name, same old crap. If you want conversation, get a parrot. You two will LOVE each other.